Submitted by The Political E... on Fri, 11/07/2008 - 04:55.
One more thing about SEWRPC, and how it is managed when it comes to deciding which issues to tackle, and on whose behalf.
This has been on mind, as I was out of town twice in the last month, without the documents - - and wanted to interject one matter into the ongoing debate about how that agency performs.
Now it's one thing for SEWRPC to throw up its hands helplessly when critics allege institutional passivity or benign neglect by the agency and say, "no one is accepting our recommendations; there's little we can do."
This is the argument that SEWRPC and some of its defenders have offered when explaining away the agency's lack of a major regional housing study since 1975.
And while it is true that municipalities in the region did not pick up the housing ball and run with its recommendations for more affordable housing after the 1975 report, some of the responsibility for that lack of reaction actually returns full circle to SEWRPC.
And not because SEWRPC does not believe in advocacy, though that is a very subjective term, as we shall see.
SEWRPC should bear some of the responsibility because it
did not follow through on the recommendations it made to itself in the 1975 housing study report.
Not a county board or city council or town manager, mind you:
SEWRPC itself.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
Recent comments
1 week 18 hours ago
4 weeks 2 days ago
5 weeks 4 days ago
6 weeks 16 hours ago
6 weeks 1 day ago
6 weeks 1 day ago
7 weeks 2 days ago
7 weeks 4 days ago
7 weeks 5 days ago
8 weeks 4 days ago