Submitted by johne on Mon, 09/01/2008 - 23:05.
For the umpteenth time, Andy Vuong at the Denver Post writes a story on Amendment 47 and
claims it will ban compulsory union membership.
This is wrong, as it is already against federal law to force workers to join unions.
All 47 does is stop forced 'agency fees' from workers who are non-union but are represented by the union in its collective bargaining. In union shops the union is required to represent everyone, and in those circumstances the union can charge nominal fees to the non-union workers for representing them.
That is what the amendment does. Not very easy to explain, but there it is. We need to continually pound Andy on this until he gets it right.
If we do not, the public may get the wrong impression of what 47 does and vote in favor of it due to their huge misunderstanding. Once people know what 47 actually does, they will be less likely to support it.
I wrote about this before and apparently he did not get the message. Let's try again - but this time much louder and more often.
Here is Andy's contact info.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
Recent comments
5 weeks 1 day ago
5 weeks 4 days ago
7 weeks 4 days ago
10 weeks 6 days ago
12 weeks 13 hours ago
12 weeks 3 days ago
12 weeks 4 days ago
12 weeks 4 days ago
14 weeks 1 day ago
14 weeks 1 day ago